The h4831sc load data Diaries
The h4831sc load data Diaries
Blog Article
Though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you will discover that in several instances, where one of them is detailed the opposite might be as well. Also, you will find there is a reasonably reliable marriage between them in regards to stated loads.
They are really precisely the same detail, but H4831 sc is Minimize shorter so it'll pack right into a case a lot easier then the normal, and in some instances like our 7mm rem mag it will allow us to incorporate extra powder then just the conventional H4831.
This is probably the biggest factors reloaders are admonished to make use of new data only; and to start very low whenever you will get a different number of powder. You do not seriously know (Except if the business informs you so) that the new large amount of powder was even manufactured at the identical factory as being the powder you acquire a several years in the past.
Of course you'll be able to. They are really precisely the same actual powder but the SC powder is just Slash shorter so it meters far better.
Alaska The sc loads up a tiny bit better but They may be the exact same factor, a person is just quick Slash. I’ve even mixed the normal just one with the SC and gotten the same results as using a person or one other.
Since there would not appear to be any "Formal" Load Data out there for this Load, can many of you provide a starting point with this combination and matters to think about when Functioning this Load up?
Nampa, Idaho In my expertise the sole actual big difference is that the shortcut meters much h4831 vs h4831sc better by means of reloading tools. When It really is loaded theres no useful variance. I've heard which the shortcut can have a little bit quicker burn level but It appears insignificant.
Like mentioned previously mentioned, h4831sc very same stuff. All that differs is the scale with the kernels. I did hear somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Down the road. I have no idea if that is certainly correct or not but would seem sensible to me. I take advantage of SC mainly because that is what I present in the 8 lb jug and it really works.
Any load data to support that? My 1st assumed is it is not intending to burn up the many way and velocities will be sluggish and far and wide. May be a pleasant fireworks Show!
Ballistically, this Intense Extruded powder is the exact copy of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain size, consequently, the designation SC or quick Minimize. The shorter, additional compact kernels enable the powder to stream in the powder steps extra effortlessly, assisting to ease the constant cutting of granules.
So happy your getting additional kinds of powder again in. Now you should get primers again in inventory and reloaded can start reloading yet again.. just saying
It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Uncovered a node and shot some groups. I shot a .6 five shot group currently. It's just a little slower than H1000, but shoots fantastic. Many thanks for the recommendation, It is very good to recognize that I have got choices when one particular or the opposite powder is dried up.
I realize the H4831SC offers a much better load h4831sc density But I think I've ample room in my case for the traditional H4831.
I found that my 7mag a hundred and sixty partitions had been sub MOA with 4831sc with very low to min rates. I’m talking 2700 (possibly 2800) fps, it was a lower 60s grain demand inside of a Norma circumstance. Not what I was in search of, but correct Even so.